Osteosarcoma de tipo compuesto: relato de caso
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El osteossarcoma es considerado el tumor óseo más común en perros, afecta principalmente el esqueleto apendicular de animales adultos o seniles, con edad media de siete años. La etiología del osteossarcoma apendicular canino aún permanece desconocida. Algunos factores predisponen al surgimiento de esta neoplasia, tales como: tamaño, raza y familia. La neoplasia puede ser clasificada por las características macroscópicas y radiológicas en simple, compuesta o pleomórfica. El presente artículo es un relato de caso de osteossarcoma de tipo compuesto con metástasis en pericardio, pulmón, pleura, músculos intercostales, hígado y riñones en una perra de raza Labrador Retriver. En este, se describe la historia clínica del animal, que junto con las alteraciones observadas en la necropsia y el examen histopatológico confirmaron la causa de la muerte. Se concluye que el examen histopatológico es importante para clasificar el tumor por su patrón celular e identificar la presencia de metástasis en los diferentes órganos colectados.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".