MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607307356 · doi:10.7202/1038750ar

1917 : une première célébration de la fondation de Montréal

2017· article· fr· W2607307356 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Laurier Lacroix

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers des dix · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les efforts combinés de la Société historique de Montréal, de la Société d’archéologie et de numismatique et de l’Association catholique de la Jeunesse Canadienne, sous le leadership de Victor Morin, vont permettre de réaliser la première célébration officielle de fondation de Montréal en 1917. À l’occasion du 275e anniversaire de la ville, ces associations développent un programme qui réunit origine religieuse et valeurs patriotiques, commémoration et développement historique de Ville-Marie. Différentes activités : messe épiscopale, visite guidée du Vieux Montréal, commémoration de la mémoire des fondatrices des communautés religieuses et réunion fournissent l’occasion aux représentants civils et religieux d’énoncer leur position face à Montréal et à la société canadienne. Les propos tenus lors de ces fêtes des 17 et 18 mai offrent un condensé des positions idéologiques de l’élite cléricale, canadienne — tant des francophones que des anglophones —, et française. Montréal devient un carrefour des valeurs en présence dans la société québécoise entre bonententisme et nationalisme, francophilie et impérialisme britannique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers des dixSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207