Les études électorales au Québec depuis 1970 ou l'analyse de l'exceptionnalisme québécois aux urnes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les élections générales de 1970 au Québec ont marqué tant les esprits que la discipline de la science politique au Québec, en particulier les analyses s'intéressant au comportement électoral et à l’étude des partis. En effet, pour la première fois de l'histoire de la province, un parti indépendantiste, le Parti québécois (PQ), faisait son entrée à l'Assemblée nationale, « un réalignement important des divisions partisanes » (Lemieux, 1976a : 60) remettant en question le bipartisme tenace de l’échiquier politique québécois. Cette élection, ainsi que celle de 1973, ont aussi illuminé les défauts du mode de scrutin majoritaire uninominal à un tour (MU1), le PQ récoltant respectivement 7 sièges pour 23% du vote et 6 sièges pour 30% du vote–frustrant une grande partie de l’électorat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".