MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Flow promotes insulin uptake and transcytosis in microvascular endothelial cells independently of nitric oxide – potential role of the actin cytoskeleton

2016· article· en· W2607364113 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Paymon Azizi, Changsen Wang, Bryan Heit, Amira Klip, Warren L. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersBanting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of TorontoCanadian Diabetes Association
KeywordsTranscytosisCell biologyNitric oxideActin cytoskeletonCytoskeletonChemistryActinInsulinBiologyCellBiochemistryEndocrinologyEndocytosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The muscle and adipose microvasculature forms a tight endothelial barrier separating tissues like muscle and adipose from the blood. Transport of circulating insulin out of the microvasculature to reach muscle is a rate‐limiting step to insulin action. Most evidence suggests that this occurs by transport of insulin through individual endothelial cells (transcytosis); however, little is known about how this occurs. We recently developed an assay to measure insulin transcytosis through primary microvascular endothelial cells from human adipose tissue (HAMEC). However, like most in vitro studies of endothelial cells, this was done under static conditions while, in vivo , endothelial cells are constantly exposed to shear stress, a frictional force derived from blood flow. The purpose of this study was to determine whether physiological shear stress induced by flow affects insulin transcytosis by endothelial cells and if so, to determine the mechanism(s). HAMEC were exposed to static conditions or shear stress (0.5 dynes/cm 2 ) for 2h and measured uptake and transcytosis of fluorescently labelled insulin in HAMEC by confocal microscopy and Total Internal Fluorescence Microscopy, respectively. Flow increased insulin transcytosis and uptake in HAMEC by approximately two‐fold compared to static conditions. Since it has been reported that nitric oxide (NO) increases insulin uptake in aortic endothelial cells, and shear stress is known to activate nitric oxide synthase, we hypothesized that the effect of shear stress was mediated through NO. Surprisingly, exposure to the NO‐donor sodium nitroprusside had no effect on insulin uptake by HAMEC; furthermore, treatment with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor L‐NAME before and during flow did not prevent the induction of insulin transcytosis by flow. To determine if modification to the actin cytoskeleton was involved instead, we treated HAMEC with cytochalasin D (CD), which induces actin depolymerization, or with Jasplakinolide (Jas), which promotes actin polymerization. While incubation with CD or Jas under static conditions had little effect on endothelial insulin uptake, Jas largely abrogated the effect of flow to induce insulin uptake. Conversely, CD significantly enhanced flow‐induced insulin uptake by HAMEC. Together, these findings suggest a likely role for actin dynamics in regulating flow‐induced insulin uptake by microvascular endothelial cells. In summary, flow increases insulin uptake and transcytosis in adipose microvascular endothelial cells in a NO‐independent fashion; this effect is likely mediated by changes in the actin cytoskeleton. These findings may have implications for the development of therapies to enhance insulin transcytosis by the endothelium in obesity/diabetes, in which defective insulin delivery has been recorded. Support or Funding Information Ontario Graduate Scholarship; Canadian Institute of Health Research; Canadian Diabetes Association; Banting and Best Diabetes Centre

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects→French-language works237,207→