MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607399548 · doi:10.1109/tie.2017.2694414

High-Precision Hydraulic Pressure Control Based on Linear Pressure-Drop Modulation in Valve Critical Equilibrium State

2017· article· en· W2607399548 on OpenAlexaff
Chen Lv, Hong Wang, Dongpu Cao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Robustness (evolution)Electromagnetic coilControl valvesPressure dropSliding mode controlHydraulic machineryLinear motorActuatorEngineeringControl engineeringMechanicsComputer scienceMechanical engineeringNonlinear systemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High precision and fast response are of great significance for hydraulic pressure control in automotive braking systems. In this paper, a novel sliding mode control based high-precision hydraulic pressure feedback modulation is proposed. Dynamical models of the hydraulic brake system including valve dynamics are established. An open loop load pressure control based on the linear relationship between the pressure-drop and coil current in valve critical open equilibrium state is proposed, and also experimentally validated on a hardware-in-the-loop test rig. The control characteristics under different input pressures and varied coil currents are investigated. Moreover, the sensitivity of the proposed modulation on valve's key structure parameters and environmental temperatures are explored with some unexpected drawbacks. In order to achieve better robustness and precision, a sliding mode control based closed loop scheme is developed for the linear pressure-drop modulation. Comparative tests between this method and the existing methods are carried out. The results validate the effectiveness and superior performance of the proposed closed loop modulation method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations139
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial ElectronicsSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207