MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Current Controversies in Prenatal Diagnosis 2: For Those Women Screened by NIPT Using Cell-Free DNA, Maternal Serum Markers Are Obsolete

2017· article· en· W2607435716 on OpenAlexaff
Yuval Yaron, Jon Hyett, Sylvie Langlois

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCell-free fetal DNAPrenatal diagnosisTrisomyObstetricsFetusNeural tubePrenatal screeningDown syndromePregnancyGeneticsPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

(Abstracted from Prenat Diagn 2016;36:1167–1171) Clinical prenatal care includes prenatal testing for fetal birth defects, traditionally including screening with maternal serum biochemical marker(s) to detect open neural tube defects, Down syndrome, or trisomy 18. Recent advances have led to the development of noninvasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) derived from the placenta and circulating in maternal blood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.081
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.081
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207