Dedicated to the Anishnawbekwe: (who founded the Barrie Native Friendship Centre)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous articleNext article FreeDedicated to the Anishnawbekwe: (who founded the Barrie Native Friendship Centre)Lee MaracleLee Maracle Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreWords are breath tracks speaking to those who have already left their imprinton our lives.These words whisper softly from just behind the footprints of those whofirst imagined this house.Because so many of those who imagined this house were women it quickly becamea reality.I look upon the journey you must have taken from the moment of conception tothis moment when our breath tracks speak to honour you.I picture the endless nights of huddling over coffee, dreaming up the next step,knocking down obstacle after obstacle.I listen to the memories of phone calls to friends, to neighbours, to officials, even tofoes, to make this building happen.I watch from behind you as your murmurs join each others words, listen to the words linkthemselves to others until, the words became a mortgage, a building, a program…I see the moments when, nearly disheartened, overworked and not quite there yet,some of you must have considered throwing in the towel.The sighs around the table must have occasionally been heavy, then some one of youtold a joke and the spirit changed.I know before the programs, before the building, before the mortgage, there was anamazing clutch of women, who journeyed to our success.Amazing women with sure feet, endless energy and a great vision of community, Migwech toeach and every one of you. Notes This poem was originally published in Lee Maracle, Bent Box, Penticton, BC: Theytus Books, 2000, pp.127–28. It is reproduced by kind permission of the author. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Afterall Volume 43Spring/Summer 2017 Published by Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/692548 © 2017 by Central Saint Martins College of Art and Design, University of the Arts London. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.556 | 0.300 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".