Performance of Interconnection Protection Based on Distance Relaying for Wind Power Distributed Generation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a method to analyze and improve the performance of interconnection protection based on distance relaying for wind power distributed generation (DG) in distribution systems. Of particular importance is distance protection that uses the concept of prefault voltages as reference quantities found to have issues with intermittent behavior of wind power DG. This concept is normally used in different distance protective relaying applications in order to increase the fault resistance coverage capability of the distance relays as well as to ensure selectivity, dependability, and security under extreme undervoltages. The main contributions of this paper are to analyze this issue and propose a method to enhance the performance of distance protection to mitigate this issue. In this methodology, several case studies are investigated with different penetration levels, weather patterns, and configuration topology of DGs under both normal operating conditions as well as fault conditions. Results for a case study are given.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it