A second set of XEGIP-encoding genes resides on chromosome 8 of potato and tomato.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Xyloglucan-specific endoglucanase inhibitor proteins (XEGIPs) are present in a wide range of dicots, where they are believed to play a role in defense from pathogens. XEGIPs are generally present as two or three copies; however, they are reported to be present as a cluster of 10 copies in potato and tomato on chromosome 1. We have identified a second set of XEGIP-encoding genes, where two inverted copies are present on chromosome 8 of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). The same set exists in the same order on chromosome 8 of tomato (Solanum pennellii Correll). Transcript expression analysis indicates that XEGIP10 is transcribed only in roots, while XEGIP11 transcripts were not detected under normal growth conditions. Transformed potatoes (‘Bintje’ and ‘Kennebec’) overexpressing these genes did not show any changes in phenology. Foliar screening of transgenic lines for resistance to the late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary did not demonstrate a large reduction in disease progression or pathogen sporulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".