MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607639044 · doi:10.14203/jkw.v4i2.268

Kajian Asia Tenggara: Antara Narasi, Teori, dan Emansipasi

2016· article· id· W2607639044 on OpenAlexaff
Achmad Firas Khudi, Iqra Anugrah

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Kajian Wilayah · 2016
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Studies and History
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipSoutheast asiaHistoryGeographyOceanographyEthnologyPolitical scienceGeologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As an academic discipline, modern Southeast Asian Studies (SEA Studies) faces three main challenges. First of all, there is still a huge gap in scholarship and publication between the West-based and Southeast Asia-based SEA Studies. Secondly, SEA Studies is often in a dilemmatic position between the push for generalization of mainstream social sciences and the anti-causality stance of various strands of Postmodernism. Thirdly, in general there is a decline of SEA Studies in the West especially in North America. However, recent developments in SEA Studies, namely a possibility for an emancipatory SEA Studies, the shifting center of gravity for SEA Studies from North America to Asia-Pacific and the expanding higher education sector in Indonesia might present some opportunities for the development of a Southeast Asia-based SEA Studies in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Kajian WilayahSame topicAsian Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207