MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607709963 · doi:10.3917/anso.171.0161

Le concept de tension dans la sociologie de Weber

2017· article· fr· W2607709963 on OpenAlex
Philippe Steiner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueL Année sociologique · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWeber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article fait ressortir les caractéristiques essentielles du concept de tension tel que Weber le développe dans sa sociologie de la religion. A cet effet, l’article dégage les notions de compromis, de proximité psychologique et de réflexivité que Weber associe aux tensions que la religion engendre quand elle fait face à la parenté, à l’économie, à la politique, à la sexualité, à l’art et à la rationalisation intellectuelle. Enfin, l’article montre comment le concept de tension permet d’enrichir l’interprétation de L’Ethique protestante en offrant une présentation dynamique et conflictuelle de la relation entre esprit du capitalisme et ascétisme protestant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.025
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it