MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607734965 · doi:10.4000/books.psn.153

Lorsque le sujet devient agent : écriture et engagement chez Annie Ernaux

2015· book-chapter· fr· W2607734965 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara Havercroft

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses Sorbonne Nouvelle eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis la fin des années 1980, la notion complexe d’engagement a fait couler beaucoup d’encre chez certaines théoriciennes et philosophes œuvrant principalement en Amérique du Nord. Des chercheures telles que Judith Butler (dont certains ouvrages ont enfin été traduits en français), Helga Druxes, Patricia Mann, Rita Felski, Susan Hekman et Shirley Neuman ont avancé de nouvelles conceptions de l’engagement, en se servant de termes comme « agentivité » (traduction française du terme anglais age...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses Sorbonne Nouvelle eBooksSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207