MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607763679 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.339

339 1H-NMR–based metabolomics identifies new predictive urinary biomarkers and highlights the pathobiology of ketosis in periparturient dairy cows

2017· article· en· W2607763679 on OpenAlexaff
Burim N. Ametaj, Elda Dervishi, Raju K. Mandal, David S. Wishart, Guanshi Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreatinineKetosisInternal medicineEndocrinologyUrineMedicineMetaboliteUrinary systemMetabolomicsBiomarkerDiabetes mellitusChemistryBiologyBioinformaticsBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to investigate metabolic fingerprints in the urine of preketotic cows as well as during and after the occurrence of disease and to identify newly predictive and diagnostic urine biomarkers that can be used to distinguish cows with ketosis from healthy controls (CON). In this study, proton nuclear magnetic resonance–based metabolomics was performed to analyze urine samples from 6 cows with ketosis and 20 CON cows at −8 wk, −4 wk, disease diagnosis, +4 wk, and +8 wk relative to parturition. Univariate (t-test or Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test; significance, P < 0.05) and multivariate analyses (permutation test; P < 0.05) and biomarker analysis (empirical; P < 0.05) were used to select metabolite sets for the noninvasive prediction and diagnosis of ketosis. All data analyses were performed using MetaboAnalyst 3.0. A total of 14, 21, 14, 2, and 2 differential metabolites between the 2 groups were identified at −8 wk, −4 wk, disease diagnosis, +4 wk, and +8 wk, respectively. VIP plots ranked the most significant differential metabolites that contributed to the onset and progression of ketosis. Specifically, concentrations of pantothenic acid (i.e., 3.42 vs. 1.44 μM/mM creatinine at −8 wk [P = 0.04], 2.9 vs. 1.26 μM/mM creatinine at −4 wk [P = 0.01], and 3.04 vs. 1.54 μM/mM creatinine at the disease week [P = 0.03]) and myo-inositol (i.e., 31.89 vs. 10.73 at −8 wk [P < 0.01], 26.35 vs. 9.17 at −4 wk [P < 0.01], and 21.85 vs. 13.26 at the disease week [P = 0.04]) were persistently greater in the urine of both preketotic and ketotic cows when compared with CON cows. Urinary concentrations of urea were lower in preketotic and ketotic cows versus the CON group at −8 wk (41.79 vs. 146.55; P < 0.01), −4 wk (44.51 vs. 144.3; P = 0.04), and the disease week (43.77 vs. 194.57; P < 0.01). Moreover, 2 promising biomarker models were identified for prediction of ketosis with an excellent level of sensitivity and specificity. Overall, multiple urine metabolite alterations were identified in preketotic, ketotic, and postketotic cows, which could be used as potential screening biomarkers as well as to better understand the pathobiology of disease and to develop new preventive treatments in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockFrench-language works237,207