MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2607947623 · doi:10.1002/mma.4411

Dynamics of virus infection models with density‐dependent diffusion and Beddington–DeAngelis functional response

2017· article· en· W2607947623 on OpenAlexaff
Shaoli Wang, Jia‐Fang Zhang, Fei Xu, Xinyu Song

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Henan ProvinceChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFunctional responseMathematicsDynamics (music)Basic reproduction numberViral infectionVirusStrain (injury)DiffusionLyapunov functionApplied mathematicsDiffusion processVirologyBiologyComputer scienceMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we integrate both density‐dependent diffusion process and Beddington–DeAngelis functional response into virus infection models to consider their combined effects on viral infection and its control. We perform global analysis by constructing Lyapunov functions and prove that the system is well posed. We investigated the viral dynamics for scenarios of single‐strain and multi‐strain viruses and find that, for the multi‐strain model, if the basic reproduction number for all viral strains is greater than 1, then each strain persists in the host. Our investigation indicates that treating a patient using only a single type of therapy may cause competitive exclusion, which is disadvantageous to the patient's health. For patients infected with several viral strains, the combination of several therapies is a better choice. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Methods in the Applied SciencesSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207