Experimental study on loss-prevention performance of oil-based drilling fluids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Compared to the water-based drilling fluids, lost circulation is more prone to occur when drilling with oil-based drilling fluids and it is difficult to deal with this problem on the drilling site for lack of high-efficiency lost circulation materials. In order to solve this technical problem, the principles of pressure resistance plugging technology of oil-based drilling fluids was firstly investigated according to the force-chain principle of granular matter mechanics, and rigid bridging particles, elastic packing particles and micro fibers could synergistically form fracture tight sealing zones with strong force-chain network to strengthen the lost circulation prevention ability of oil-based drilling fluids. Based on the principle above, novel loss-prevention materials were finally developed for oil-based drilling fluids by optimizing different plugging agents. Experimental results show that novel loss-prevention materials could be compatible with other components of oil-based drilling fluids. The oil-based drilling fluids with high sealing capacity could be optimized by adding novel loss-prevention materials, and it exhibits good rheological behavior with a low PPT filtration of 11.4 mL and excellent lost circulation prevention ability to strengthen the wellbore while drilling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".