MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2608101747 · doi:10.1093/sleepj/zsx050.788

0789 CIRCADIAN RHYTHMICITY IN THE ICU: URINARY MELATONIN EXCRETION OF ADULT ICU PATIENTS

2017· article· en· W2608101747 on OpenAlexaffabout
AL Ash, Diana E. McMillan, William Diehl‐Jones, Arora Rc, Andrew Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCircadian rhythm and melatonin
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAthabasca UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
FundersUniversiteit Utrecht
KeywordsMelatoninCircadian rhythmMedicineExcretionPhysiologyIntensive care unitInternal medicineUrinary systemUrineEndocrinologyPopulationCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The circadian rhythm is an internal body cadence, responsible for regulation of sleep in all mammals. In humans, this clock is altered by several factors, including light and secretion of the hormone melatonin. Within the intensive care unit (ICU) population, it is well evidenced that patients suffer from circadian dysregulation, often for long periods of time. A prospective cohort pilot study of five subjects was undertaken to enable a greater understanding of sleep in medical ICU in Manitoba, Canada. From a total of thirty-six urine samples per subject, excretion of 6sulphatoxymelatonin (aMT6s), the urinary metabolite of melatonin was analyzed. T-test comparison (p=0.05) of mean aMT6s (ng/mL) demonstrated significant differences in the nighttime excretion between subjects in this study and healthy individuals. No significant differences were observed when compared with mean aMT6s of ICU subjects in previous literature. Significant aberrancies in nighttime urinary melatonin excretion can be observed when compared to healthy individuals in adult medical ICU patients. NA

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicCircadian rhythm and melatoninFrench-language works237,207