MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2608128379 · doi:10.1093/sleepj/zsx050.1071

1072 SLEEP TRAJECTORIES FROM ADOLESCENCE TO ADULTHOOD AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH HEALTH OUTCOMES

2017· article· en· W2608128379 on OpenAlexaffabout
Thirumagal Kanagasabai, Geneviève Gariépy, FJ Elgar

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthSleep (system call)ObesityMedicineOddsOdds ratioLogistic regressionDemographyYoung adultMental distressLatent growth modelingPsychologyGerontologyPsychiatryDevelopmental psychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep is linked to physiological and mental health outcomes. However, little is known about sleep trajectories from adolescence to adulthood and their relationship with health outcomes. We examined sleep trajectories and their relationship with cardiometabolic and mental health in a representative sample over 16 years. We tracked participants between 1997 and 2013 from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics study and the Child Development and Transition into Adulthood Supplements (n=3,118; age 10-17y at baseline) who reported their sleep duration up to six times during the study. We used latent class growth modelling to identify distinct sleep trajectories (long sleep (8.7% of the sample), average sleep (72.5%), and short sleep (18.8%)) and assessed their relationship with self-rated health, high blood pressure, obesity, and mental health using logistic and linear regressions controlling for the year of birth. Compared to the average sleep trajectory, both short and long sleep trajectories were associated with higher odds of poor or fair self-rated health (OR (95% CI), p-value): 1.82 (1.16, 2.84), p=0.01 and 1.89 (0.98, 3.63), p=0.06, respectively). Both short and long sleep trajectories also had greater mental health problems in adulthood (OR 1.66 (1.11, 2.49), p=0.01) and 1.99 (1.07, 3.69), p=0.03), respectively). Only the trajectory of short sleep was associated with higher odds of having high blood pressure (OR 1.81 (1.06, 3.12), p=0.03), greater distress (β (95% CI), p-value: 1.51 (0.73, 2.28), p<0.01) and lower mental well-being (β -0.63 (-1.15, -0.10, p=0.02)) compared to average sleep trajectory. We found no significant association between sleep trajectories and obesity. We found evidence that short and long sleep trajectories from adolescence to adulthood are linked to poor physiological and mental health outcomes in adulthood. Individuals that follow a trajectory of short sleep seemed particularly vulnerable to poor mental well-being as young adults. Additional research is needed to extend our understanding of the relationship between sleep trajectories over the lifespan and their effect health outcomes. GG is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. FJE is supported by a Canada Research Chairs program.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207