The Potency of Halim Perdanakusuma Airport Development as Commercial Airport
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, Halim Perdanakusuma Airport plays a role in facilitating commercial and military flight activities. In the commercial flight segment, the role of Halim Perdanakusuma airport is expected to reduce the load of Soekarno-Hatta International Airport in serving the ever increasing flight volume. As part of this concern, this article analyzes the potency of Halim Perdanakusuma Aiport to respond the growing demand of commercial flight based on land side and air side development potential factors. The potency of development from land side is based on the space availability to meet the standard of passenger service facilities, whereas the air side is based on the airport runway capacity in accommodating the number of aircraft take-off and landing activities according to their types as well as loading capacities. The need for airport development is based on the standard of space needs for each passenger during the peak time. Analysis result shows that the most critical constraint is coming from land sidedue to space limitation for the development of various facilities required to fulfil the service standard, which available only for up to 2,750,369 total passengers per year. Meanwhile, there is no significant constraint for airport development from the air side point of view.AbstrakSaat ini, Bandara Halim Perdanakusuma berperan dalam memfasilitasi kegiatan penerbangan komersil dan militer. Pada segmen penerbangan komersial, peran Bandara Halim Perdanakusuma diharapkan dapat mengurangi beban Bandara Internasional Soekarno-Hatta dalam melayani volume penerbangan komersial yang semakin meningkat. Fokus tulisan ini adalah menganalisis potensi Bandara Halim Perdanakusuma dalam merespon tumbuhnya permintaan dari penerbangan komersial berdasarkan faktor-faktor potensi pengembangan sisi darat dan sisi udara. Potensi pengembanga dari sisi darat didasarkan pada ketersediaan ruang untuk memenuhi standar fasilitas pelayanan penumpang, sedangkan dari sisi udara berdasarkan pada potensi pengembangan kapasitas landasan pacu bandara dalam melayani aktifitas take-off dan pendaratan pesawat sesuai dengan jenis dan kapasitas angkutnya. Kebutuhan untuk pengembangan bandar udara didasarkan pada standar kebutuhan ruang untuk penumpang pada waktu puncak. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa kendala pengembangan bandara terutama datang dari sisi darat yang disebabkan oleh keterbatasan ruang bagi pengembangan berbagai fasilitas yang diperlukan untuk memenuhi standar pelayanan, yang hanya tersedia untuk melayani 2.750.369 total penumpang per tahun. Sementara itu, tidak terdapat kendala yang signikan untuk pengembangan bandara dari sisi udara.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".