MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2608198541 · doi:10.1111/ddi.12565

Does urbanization lead to taxonomic and functional homogenization in riparian forests?

2017· article· en· W2608198541 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversity and Distributions · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityEspace pour la vie
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSpecies richnessEcologyRiparian zoneUrbanizationBeta diversityBiodiversityGamma diversityRiparian forestBiologyHomogenization (climate)Species diversityGeographyAlpha diversityHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim In urbanized areas, exotic invasions, native extinctions, and the alteration of habitats and natural processes drive homogenization, which is a form of biotic impoverishment. This study examines whether urbanization and flooding induce homogenization of herbaceous communities in riparian forests and quantifies the relationships between taxonomic and functional β‐diversity. Location Montréal, Québec, Canada. Methods Inventories were conducted in 56 riparian forests. Taxonomic and functional β‐diversity were calculated as between‐site similarities in species or trait composition for three levels of urbanization and flooding. Differences among the disturbance levels were compared using tests for homogeneity in multivariate dispersions. We quantified the correlation between local species richness, exotic proportion, taxonomic and functional β‐diversity. We also partitioned taxonomic β‐diversity into species turnover and richness difference. Results Urbanization led to taxonomic and functional differentiation, while increased flooding led to taxonomic and functional homogenization. We found a significant correlation between taxonomic and functional β‐diversity. Changes in β‐diversity were associated with species and trait turnover among both urbanization and flood levels, and with changes in species richness. Differentiation was associated with low species richness, and homogenization with high species richness. Exotic invasions tended to favour differentiation, but only at a low urbanization level. Main Conclusions The effect of urbanization on plant diversity in riparian forests was twofold: first, it directly induced taxonomic and functional differentiation through its effect on species loss and turnover (higher β‐diversity at high urbanization level); second, differentiation was indirectly favoured through the reduction in flooding (higher β‐diversity at low flood level). Taxonomic and functional β‐diversity followed similar patterns, likely because species invasions and extinctions are not random, but are related to species traits. Our results underline the need to move our focus from exotic species to the true underlying factors of biodiversity loss and homogenization, notably land use changes and human disturbances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it