MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2608203645 · doi:10.1093/sleepj/zsx050.1167

1168 CHARACTERIZATION OF CHRONIC SLEEP-WAKE DISTURBANCES OCCURRING AFTER MODERATE TO SEVERE TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

2017· article· en· W2608203645 on OpenAlexaff
Héjar El-Khatib, Caroline Arbour, E Sanchez-Gonzalez, Catherine Duclos, Hélène Blais, Marie Dumont, Nadia Gosselin

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActigraphyEpworth Sleepiness ScaleMoodBeck Depression InventoryTraumatic brain injuryPsychologyBeck Anxiety InventoryDepression (economics)PopulationGlasgow Coma ScalePittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexSleep disorderMedicinePhysical therapyAnxietyPsychiatryInsomniaPolysomnographyElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep-wake disturbances (SWD) are among the most prevalent and disabling consequences reported after a moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), but remain poorly understood. Our aim was to better characterize post-TBI SWD using a combination of subjective and objective measures. Moreover, we aimed to verify whether specific types of SWD were associated with markers of TBI severity. Thirty-five individuals with moderate to severe TBI (24M/11F; aged: 27.6 ± 9.6 years; Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) score at hospital admission: 8.6 ± 3.3) were evaluated between 1–3 years post-injury. SWD were assessed using questionnaires (e.g. Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Fatigue Severity Scale), as well as with a 7-day sleep diary and simultaneous actigraphy. We also used the Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory, as mood fluctuations have been associated with SWD in this population. Scores on questionnaires and actigraphy variables (sleep efficiency, total sleep time and number of naps) were entered into a principal component analysis (PCA) to extract non-correlated SWD and mood components. We performed correlations between each of these components and clinical variables representing TBI severity (e.g., duration of post-traumatic amnesia and GCS score). The rotated PCA produced four non-correlated components, namely 1) Fatigue/Mood fluctuation, 2) Daytime sleepiness, 3) Increased sleep duration and 4) Sleep efficiency, which explained 75% of the variance on questionnaires and actigraphic measures. The component “Fatigue/Mood fluctuation” was positively correlated with more prolonged post-traumatic amnesia (r=0.44 p<0.01). However, the other three components were not associated with markers of TBI severity. Our results suggest that SWD after moderate-to-severe TBI are highly heterogeneous, but they can be conceptualized into two wakefulness and two sleep non-correlated components. Interestingly, daytime disturbances were not associated with sleep disturbances, which suggest that the injured brain deregulates wakefulness mechanisms independently of sleep.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207