MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2608257271 · doi:10.1080/10236198.2017.1318866

Corrigendum to Braverman, E.; Chatzarakis, G. E.; Stavroulakis, I. P. Iterative oscillation tests for difference equations with several non-monotone arguments. J. Difference Equ. Appl. 21 (2015), no. 9, 854–874

2017· erratum· en· W2608257271 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Difference Equations and Applications · 2017
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Differential Equations Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsStatement (logic)Monotone polygonConfusionApplied mathematicsOscillation (cell signaling)Section (typography)Mathematical economicsCalculus (dental)Pure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsMedicineComputer scienceEpistemologyPhilosophyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Section 3 of our paper, the confusion with indices resulted in the incorrect statement of Theorems 3.3, 3.4, 3.3′ and 3.4′ (pp. 864–867), as well as influenced Example 4.3 (pp. 872–873). We sincerely apologize and present the corrected version below.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it