Quantitative Relation of the Point BarWidth and Meander Belt Width of Subsurface Reservoir
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to large lateral oscillation amplitude, it tends to form complex meander belt in meandering river, which makes the internal sand body size and distribution characteristics of meandering river deposits in different region very complex. Subsurface reservoir architectural elements analysis based on the experience formula summarized from the outcrop and modern deposition research tends to have greater uncertainty. Microfacies sandbody size was measured through fine reservoir architecture research on mature area of target oilfield, it is concluded that meandering river microfacies sandbody scale is closely related to the size of the sedimentary system, the point bar width has the highest degree in related to meander belt width in the narrow banding patterns. Under different curvature, meandering river point bar length and width present a certain positive correlation, when the curvature is less than 1.7, the correlation is higher. The quantitative relation of different configuration unit of the target oilfield was established，it provided a quantitative basis for fine research and geological modeling on less well area of target oilfield and similar oilfield.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".