MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2608307976 · doi:10.1149/2.0131707jes

3D Porous Sphere-Like Aggregates of Bimetallic PtRh Nanoparticles Grown onto Carbon Nanotubes: Efficient and Durable Catalyst for the Ethanol Oxidation Reaction

2017· article· en· W2608307976 on OpenAlexafffund
Amel Tabet‐Aoul, Haixia Wang, Youling Wang, Mohamed Mohamedi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship CouncilCentre québécois sur les matériaux fonctionnels
KeywordsBimetallic stripMaterials scienceNanostructureNanoparticleElectrocatalystCatalysisChemical engineeringCarbon nanotubePorosityNanotechnologyElectrochemistryElectrodeComposite materialChemistryMetallurgyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A strategy for the synthesis at room temperature of binderless 3D sphere-like aggregates of bimetallic PtRh nanoparticles onto carbon nanotubes (CNTs) by cross-beam laser deposition technique is presented. The atomic ratio between the two components (Pt and Rh) is tuned by varying the laser pulse energy on the two targets independently to optimize the alloying effects. The morphology of PtRh alloy nanostructure is controlled by introducing helium gas under 2 Torr of pressure during growth. The prepared CNT/3D sphere-like aggregates bimetallic PtRh nanostructures provide a high degree of electrochemical activity and good durability toward the ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) outperforming CNT/Pt and CNT/Pt 3 Sn, which is the most actively known electrocatalyst for EOR. Therefore, the 3D CNT/PtRh alloy porous nano structures provide a good prospect to explore their catalytic properties for direct ethanol fuel cells systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical Society→Same topicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion→French-language works237,207→