Estimating Exposure by Loose-Coupling an Air Dispersion Model and a Geospatial Information System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The regulation of air quality is important for ensuring the health of a population. Current air quality decision support systems are very useful if the user possesses sufficient data to operate them and the necessary expertise to interpret their results. In general, these systems suffer as a result of their excessive complexity. The present study describes the development of a scalable air quality decision support system using the CALPUFF air dispersion model and a Geospatial Information System (GIS). This system uses receptor level exposure modeling and outputs from CALPUFF to estimate the relative impacts on human populations from multiple air pollution sources by calculating intake, defined as the amount of pollution that is inhaled by a population and intake fraction, defined as the fraction of pollutant emitted by a pollution source that is inhaled by a population. Unlike ground level pollution concentration, intake and intake fraction consider receptors and offer a more valuable estimate of pollution exposure, especially when faced with limited input data. The system also leverages the inherent strength of GIS to improve accessibility of geospatial data by generating maps of ground level pollutant concentration, intake, and intake fraction using graduated color schemes. This enables any user to identify potentially hazardous pollution sources and prioritize decisions such as development, maintenance, and decommission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it