MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2608321014 · doi:10.1161/hyp.66.suppl_1.p625

Abstract P625: Non-coding Rna Regulation Of Gene Expression In Angiotensin Ii-induced Vascular Damage

2015· article· en· W2608321014 on OpenAlexaff
Ku-Geng Huo, Tlili Barhoumi, Júlio C Fraulob-Aquino, Chantal Richer, Mathieu Lajoie, Daniel Sinnett, Pierre Paradis, Ernesto L. Schiffrin

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmicroRNAAngiotensin IIBiologyRNAGeneGene expressionNon-coding RNAFold changeRNA extractionMessenger RNALong non-coding RNARenin–angiotensin systemBioinformaticsInternal medicineEndocrinologyGeneticsBlood pressureMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including long ncRNAs (lncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRs), account for ~98% of the transcribed RNAs. They have been shown to play a role in cardiovascular disease. Vascular damage is an early manifestation and a cause of end-organ damage in hypertension. However, it is unknown whether ncRNAs are involved in the development of vascular injury in hypertension. We hypothesize that ncRNA regulation participates in mechanisms of vascular remodeling and plays an important role in the pathophysiology of hypertension. Methods and Results: Ten-week old male C57BL/6 mice were infused or not with angiotensin (Ang) II for 14 days. Systolic blood pressure (BP) determined by telemetry was increased by Ang II infusion compared to control (146±8 vs 113±5 mmHg, P<0.001). Total RNA was extracted from mesenteric arteries for total and small RNA deep sequencing using Illumina HiSeq-2500. Sequences were aligned to the mm10 genome with STAR, annotated and counted using HTSeq-count or miRDeep2. Differential expression analysis was done in R. Differentially expressed (DE) mRNAs (550 up & 266 down), lncRNAs (7 up & 42 down), miRs (23 up & 12 down) were identified in the Ang II-treated group (1.5 fold change, q<0.05). Targetscan was used to predict interactions between DE miRs and the inversely correlated DE mRNAs or DE lncRNAs. MEME Suite was used to predict DE transcription factor binding sites in the promoter region of genes encoding DE mRNAs, lncRNAs and miRs. Cytoscape was used to construct molecular networks integrating the above interactions and the gene expression profile and to perform functional enrichment analysis, which revealed enrichment of extracellular matrix and developmental processes in DE miR-targeting DE mRNAs (q<1E-20). Ten DE miRNAs whose expression levels correlated (P<0.05) with BP were identified, 9 of which are located in a single miRNA cluster that is conserved in humans. Conclusions: We have identified a conserved miRNA cluster that may play a pivotal role in the regulation of vascular damage in hypertension. A sub-network of genes that participates in the interaction between the miRNA cluster and other BP-correlated RNAs was selected for future investigation to identify therapeutic targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207