Les associations thématiques du motif de l’eau dans un roman québécois : ‘HKPQ’ de Michèle Plomer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans notre communication nous nous proposons d’analyser le motif de l’eau comme symbole de médiation culturelle dans le roman francophone. Le texte choisi, c’est le roman de l’écrivaine canadienne Michèle Plomer : HKPQ (2009), récompensé par le prix littéraire ‘France-Québec’ en 2010. Les images aquatiques véhiculent avec naturel des échanges entre deux pays (le Canada et la Chine) agençant des passerelles du passé à l’avenir dans la vie de la narratrice. L’eau apparaît chargée d’une signification double. Elle évolue de la noirceur qui accompagne la noyade du fiancé dans le fleuve Saint-Laurent à Montréal dans l’incipit du livre au rayonnement éblouissant de Poissonne, accompagnatrice dans le processus de guérison émotionnelle tout au long de son séjour professionnel chinois. Ce poisson femelle qu’elle observe quotidiennement dans le bocal contribue à montrer la voie libératrice de cette femme et s’instaure en guide éveilleur d’une nouvelle perception existentielle.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/XXVColloqueAFUE.2016.2519
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".