MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2608616104 · doi:10.1142/s0217751x17500713

Inflation of universe due to nonlinear electrodynamics

2017· article· en· W2608616104 on OpenAlexaff
S. I. Kruglov

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics A · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCMB cold spotUniverseInflation (cosmology)De Sitter universeFlatness problemMinkowski spaceParticle horizonMetric expansion of spaceQuantum electrodynamicsBig RipInflationary epochTheoretical physicsClassical mechanicsCosmologyDark energyMathematical physicsAstrophysicsQuantum mechanicsCosmic microwave background

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A model of nonlinear electrodynamics with a dimensional parameter [Formula: see text] is considered. Electromagnetic fields are the source of the gravitation field and inflation of the universe. We imply that the universe is filled by stochastic magnetic fields. It is demonstrated that after the universe inflation the universe decelerates approaching the Minkowski space–time. We evaluate the spectral index, the tensor-to-scalar ratio, and the running of the spectral index which approximately agree with the Planck and WMAP data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics ASame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207