MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2608629040 · doi:10.3968/9422

Establishment of Geological Knowledge Database for Meandering River Reservoirs in Offshore Oilfields With Large Well Spacing

2017· article· en· W2608629040 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaoming Ye, Chunliang Huo, Jianmin Yang, Jing Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySubmarine pipelinePoint barWell loggingFaciesReservoir modelingPetrologyPetroleum engineeringGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on quantitative logging microfacies identification, seismic constraint facies map compilation and horizontal wells architecture analysis, the reservoir geologic knowledge database of different grades configuration unit was established for meandering river reservoirs of Lower Minghuazhen Formation in Q oilfield. The results show that the average point bar sand body width is 360-783 m, the average sand body thickness is 4.0-8.5 m, the ratio of width to thickness mainly distributed in 40-100. Average lateral accretion layers dip is 5.7°, lateral accretion layers horizontal interval mainly distributed in 70-200 m. On the basis of reservoir geological knowledge database, a fine geological model was established together with sequential indicator method and equivalent characterization method. Base on the reservoir geologic knowledge database and geological modeling results, 130 adjustment wells were successfully deployed and implemented at the comprehensive adjustment process of Q oilfield, these wells made an obvious oil production increase effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207