MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2608645481 · doi:10.5539/enrr.v7n2p47

Research on Water Quality Assessment Model Based on Improved Three-Dimensional Nemerow Index Method and Firefly Algorithm

2017· article· en· W2608645481 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jian Cao, LI Zheng-long, Yuanbiao Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment and Natural Resources Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicResearch studies in Vietnam
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJinan University
KeywordsIndex methodFirefly algorithmIndex (typography)Computer scienceWater qualityEvaluation methodsQuality (philosophy)AlgorithmQuality assessmentReliability engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring water quality is a subject of ongoing concern and study since water quality is closely related to human life. Although Nemerow index method is widely used in water quality assessment, the artificial threshold setting may lead to some errors. In this study, we improved the traditional Nemerow index method and built a three-dimensional water quality assessment model combined with the modified firefly algorithm (FA). Then, we applied the improved three-dimensional Nemerow index method to evaluate 100 random water samples. Compared with the traditional method, the improved one proved to be more objective, scientific and practical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironment and Natural Resources ResearchSame topicResearch studies in VietnamFrench-language works237,207