Aménagement du territoire et politiques favorables à un mode de vie physiquement actif et à une saine alimentation au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse les politiques et mesures publiques mises en oeuvre depuis 2006 au Québec afin que l’aménagement du territoire devienne plus propice à l’adoption d’un mode de vie physiquement actif et d’une saine alimentation. L’analyse est fondée sur un inventaire et un codage caractérisant les mesures qui tentent de modifier l’environnement physique, pour influencer l’alimentation, l’utilisation du transport actif et public, de même que la pratique d’activités physiques diverses. Nous comparons ces mesures québécoises adoptées par les autorités locales, régionales et nationales aux recommandations scientifiques en promotion des saines habitudes de vie. Cette comparaison a été soumise à un processus délibératif incluant experts et parties prenantes. L’article présente des recommandations quant aux stratégies d’aménagement du territoire les plus prometteuses pour favoriser un mode de vie physiquement actif et une saine alimentation aux niveaux local, régional et national, ainsi que les implications que cela comporte sur le plan politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".