MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Catalytic α Subunit of cAMP‐Dependent Protein Kinase Regulates Formoterol‐Induced Gene Expression in BEAS‐2B Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells

2017· article· en· W2608860400 on OpenAlexaffabout
Omar Hamed, Robert Newton

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNuclear Receptors and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFormoterolProtein subunitProtein kinase ACell biologyGeneKinaseChemistryMAP3K7BiologyCyclin-dependent kinase 2BiochemistryImmunologyAsthma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale The β 2 ‐adrenoceptor is a GPCR that classically couples to Gsα, the activation of adenylyl cyclases and the formation of cAMP. Through distinct signalling complexes often containing cAMP‐dependent protein kinase (PKA), cAMP mediates a myriad of functional responses including the regulation of gene expression. We have shown previously that in the BEAS‐2B human airway epithelial cell line, long acting β 2 ‐adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) induce cAMP response element (CRE) dependent transcription, which we suggest contributes to their therapeutic activity in obstructive lung diseases. In the current study we have extended those findings by identifying the PKA catalytic subunit responsible for mediating gene expression induced by the LABA, formoterol. Methods Microarray, RT‐PCR, western blotting and gene silencing were used to identify and implicate PKA catalytic subunits in the regulation of LABA‐induced gene expression. A CRE reporter construct stably transfected into BEAS‐2B cells was used for this purpose together with an assessment of CREB phosphorylation and an analysis of a panel of cAMP‐inducible genes ( NR4A3, CRISPLD2, RGS2, NR4A2, CD200 and IL‐6 ). Results Microarray‐based gene expression profiling indicated that BEAS‐2B cells express mRNA transcripts for PRKACA (Cα), PRKACB (Cβ) and PRKX (C x ) whereas PRKACG (Cg) was absent. These data were confirmed at the protein level by western blotting. siRNAs were optimized to achieve 80 to 90% knockdown of PRKACA , PRKACB and PRKX , which was reproduced at the protein level. Under these conditions, silencing PRKACA was associated with a significant (~50%) abrogation of formoterol‐induced CRE reporter activation, CREB phosphorylation and gene expression. No additional effect was seen when siRNAs that target PRKACB or PRKX were used in combination with those directed towards PRKACA . Conclusions These data show that Cα is an essential cAMP signalling component controlling formoterol‐induced gene transcription in BEAS‐2B cells. The incomplete inhibition produced under conditions of 80–90% Cα knockdown implies that this PKA catalytic subunit is present in significant excess of that required to maximally mediate cAMP‐induced gene expression. This is an initial first step at identifying cAMP signalling components (adenylyl cyclases, scaffold proteins, phosphodiesterases and effectors) that control LABA‐induced functional responses in airway structural cells. We propose that identifying these components and their assembly into multiprotein signalling complexes could provide new opportunities for the development of novel therapies for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Support or Funding Information Alberta Lung Association (ALA)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicNuclear Receptors and SignalingFrench-language works237,207