MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2609025987 · doi:10.15625/0866-7187/39/2/9448

Assessment of earthquake-induced ground liquefaction susceptibility for Hanoi city using geological and geomorphologic characteristics

2017· article· en· W2609025987 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bui Thi Nhung, Nguyễn Hồng Phương, Nguyen Ta Nam

Bibliographic record

VenueVietnam Journal of Earth Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiquefactionGeologyLithologySeismic hazardSeismologySoil liquefactionMining engineeringGeotechnical engineeringGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the earthquake-induced liquefaction susceptibility of Hanoi city is assessed using the recent published geological and geomorphologic data. A combination of classification methods based on the distribution of sedimentary deposits proposed by Youd and Perkins (1978) and geomorphologic units proposed by Iwasaki (1982) was applied. The subsurface lithology and geomorphologic maps were combined in a GIS platform for assessing the liquefaction susceptibility of Hanoi city.The resulting map shows that the liquefaction hazard of Hanoi city classified into four categories: high, moderate, low liquefaction potential and not likely areas. In the most of Hanoi area, the ground liquefaction potentials are moderate. The high liquefaction likely areas spread along the river beds and around the lake areas. The not likely and low liquefaction potential areas are observed mainly in the northwest and northeast of the study region such as Chanchim, Soc Son, and Bavi mountains. The present map can help the scientists, engineers, and planners to have the general information on regional liquefaction potential of the Hanoi city. ReferencesBird JF, Bommer JJ, 2004b. Earthquake Losses due to Ground Failure. Submitted to Engineering Geology, 75(2), 147-179.Bird Juliet F, Bommer Julian J., 2004a. Evaluating earthquake losses due to ground failure and identifying their relative contribution (Paper no. 3156). In Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, august 1-6.Bui Van Duan, Nguyen Cong Thang, Nguyen Van Vuong, Pham Dinh Nguyen, 2013. The magnitude of the largest possible earthquake in the Muong La-Bac Yen fault zone. J. Sci. of the Earth, 35(1), 53-59.Dao Dinh Bac, Dang Van Bao, 2010. Geomorphologic characteristics, the ancient river beds system of the capital city and their values to the development of the Thang Long - Hanoi. International Workshop commemorating the 1000 years of Thang Long, Hanoi. Vietnam national University, Hanoi.Ganapathy, G. P., Rajawat, A. S., 2012. Evaluation of liquefaction potential hazard of Chennai city, India: using geological and geomorphological characteristics. Natural hazards, 64(2), 1717-1729.Goyal, A., Sinha, R., Chaudhari, M. and Jaiswal, K., 2001. Performance of Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Ahmedabad during Bhuj Earthquake January 26, 2001. Workshop on Recent Earthquakes of Chamoli and Bhuj: Volume I, Roorkee, India, May 24-26.Iwasaki, T., Tokida, K., Tatsuoka, F., Watanabe, S., Yasuda, S., Sato, H., 1982. Microzonation for soil liquefaction potential using simplified methods. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on microzonation, Seattle, 3, 1310-1330.Kuribayashi E., Tatsuoka, F., 1975. Brief review of liquefaction during earthquake in Japan,” Soils and Foundations, 15(4), 81-92.Lew M, Naeim F, Huang SC, Lam HK, Carpenter LD, 2000. Geotechnical and geological effects of the 21 September 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan. Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 9, 89-106.National Research Council, 1985. Ishihara 1985. Liquefaction of Soils During Earthquake, National Academy press, 240, p.34. Nguyen Hong Phuong (Project Manager), 2002. Study of seismic risk of Hanoi city. Project code 01C-04/09-2001-2. Institute for Marine Geology and Geophysics, VAST.Nguyen Hong Phuong (Project Manager), 2007. Application of GIS technology to Development of a model for seismic risk analysis for Hanoi city. Institute for Marine Geology and Geophysics, VAST.Nguyen Hong Phuong (Project Manager), 2014. Estimation of Site Effects and Assessment of Urban Seismic Risk for Hanoi city. National Scientific Research Project Final report, Institute of Geophysics, VAST.Nguyen Hong Phuong and Pham The Truyen, 2014. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for South Central Vietnam. J. Sci. of the Earth, 36(4), 451-461.Phan Trong Trinh, Hoang Quang Vinh, Nguyen Van Huong, Ngo Van Liem, 2013. Active fault segmentation and seismic hazard in Hoa Binh reservoir, Vietnam. Cent. Eur. J. Geosci, 5(2), 223-235.Phan Trong Trinh, Ngo Van Liem, Nguyen Van Huong, Hoang Quang Vinh, Bui Van Thom, Bui Thi Thao, Mai Thanh Tan, Nguyen Hoang, 2012. Late Quaternary tectonics and seismotectonics along the Red River fault zone, North Vietnam. Earth-Science Reviews 114, 224-235.Susumu Yasuda, Nozomu Yoshida, Hiroyoshi Kiku, Hidenori Abo, and Masato Uda, 2001. Analyses of Liquefaction-Induced Deformation of Grounds and Structures by a Simple Method (March 26). International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, p.27. http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/icrageesd/04icrageesd/session04/27.Updike, R. G., Egan, J. A., Moriwaki, Y., Idriss, I. M., Moses, T. L., 1988. A model for earthquake-induced translatory landslides in Quaternary sediments. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 100(5), 783-792.Vu Thanh Tam (Project Manager), 2014. Study and propose a reasonable threshold for preventing the subsidence caused by ground water exploitation, pilot application for downtown area of the Hanoi city. Final report of the Scientific research and technology development Project, National Center for water resource planning and investigation. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment.Youd T. L., 1993. Liquefaction, ground failure and consequent damage during the 22 April 1991 Costa Rica earthquake. Abridged from EERI Proceedings: U.S. Costa Rica Workshop, http://nisee.berkeley.edu/costarica/Youd T. L., and Hoose S.N., 1977. Liquefaction Susceptibility and Geologic Setting, Proceedings, 6th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Delhi, India, 6, 37-42.Youd T. L., and Perkins D. M., 1978. Mapping liquefaction-induced ground failure potential. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 104, GT4, 433-446.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVietnam Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207