Explorer le vécu de la crise à partir de la parole incarnée d’intervenants professant en unité de crise et d’urgences psychiatriques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose de partager le vécu de la crise d’intervenants professant en unité de crise et d’urgences psychiatriques. Cette première étape représente le point de départ d’une étude plus large qui vise à mettre en lumière les processus thérapeutiques à l’oeuvre dans le travail clinique de crise. Après une brève présentation de la problématique, du paradigme épistémologique et de la démarche méthodologique, nous déployons le processus du déroulement de la recherche. Pour conclure, nous proposons d’exposer les résultats. L’intérêt est porté sur les données empiriques qui mettent en lumière la parole incarnée des intervenants. Notre objectif est de donner du sens à l’essence du vécu des intervenants participant à cette étude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.046 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".