MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2609284557 · doi:10.1215/15476715-3342641

Dangerously Sleepy: Overworked Americans and the Cult of Manly Wakefulness Meet Joe Copper: Masculinity and Race on Montana's World War II Home Front

2016· article· en· W2609284557 on OpenAlexaff
Steven Maynard

Bibliographic record

VenueLabor Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasculinityCultRace (biology)Home frontWorld War IIFront (military)GerontologyPsychologyGender studiesSociologyHistoryEngineeringAncient historyMedicineArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Book Review| February 01 2016 Dangerously Sleepy: Overworked Americans and the Cult of Manly Wakefulness Meet Joe Copper: Masculinity and Race on Montana's World War II Home Front Dangerously Sleepy: Overworked Americans and the Cult of Manly Wakefulness. Derickson, Alan. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2014xiii + 224 pp., $49.95 (cloth)Meet Joe Copper: Masculinity and Race on Montana's World War II Home Front. Basso, Matthew L.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013xiii + 360 pp., $90.00 (cloth); $30.00 (paper) Steven Maynard Steven Maynard Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Labor (2016) 13 (1): 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1215/15476715-3342641 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Steven Maynard; Dangerously Sleepy: Overworked Americans and the Cult of Manly Wakefulness Meet Joe Copper: Masculinity and Race on Montana's World War II Home Front. Labor 1 February 2016; 13 (1): 102–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/15476715-3342641 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsLabor Search Advanced Search The text of this article is only available as a PDF. © 2016 by Labor and Working-Class History Association2016 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLabor Studies in Working-Class History of the AmericasSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207