MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2609366403 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2017.2699183

Downlink spectrum allocation for in-band and out-band wireless backhauling of full-duplex small cells

2017· article· en· W2609366403 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBackhaul (telecommunications)Computer scienceComputer networkTelecommunications linkWirelessBase stationWireless networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In-band full-duplex (IBFD) backhauling is a potential technique for wireless backhauling of small cells that allows the use of same spectrum for the backhaul and access links of the small cell base stations (SBSs) concurrently, however, at the expense of backhaul interference and self-interference (SI). This paper investigates the problem of optimal access/backhaul spectrum allocation considering IBFD backhauling, out-of-band full-duplex (OBFD) backhauling (in which the access and backhaul transmissions take place on different spectrum), and the SBSs with the provisioning for hybrid IBFD/OBFD backhauling. We first formulate a problem to maximize the minimum achievable rate (i.e., minimum of the rates in the backhaul link and the access link) at the SBSs in a hybrid IBFD/OBFD setting. The solution of the centralized spectrum allocation problem, which serves as a benchmark for any sub-optimal solution, is provided by transforming the original problem into an epigraph form. As a special case of the formulated problem, we derive closed-form optimal solutions for the access/backhaul spectrum allocation of OBFD backhauling as well as IBFD backhauling. We then propose and comparatively analyze the performance of two distributed backhaul spectrum allocation schemes, namely, maximum received signal power (max-RSP) and minimum received signal power (min-RSP) schemes. For these schemes, we theoretically derive the number of allocated backhaul channels, minimum rate coverage probability, and average achievable rate of each SBS given its distance from the centralized wireless backhaul hub (WBH) for both IBFD and OBFD backhauling. Numerical results reveal that the optimal spectrum allocation rules can significantly vary for IBFD and OBFD backhauling. Optimal OBFD backhauling favors more backhaul spectrum for SBSs located far-away from the WBH. With IBFD backhauling, spectrum allocation for SBSs strongly depends on SI. With the reduction in SI, the optimal backhaul spectrum increases/decreases for nearby/farther SBSs. Simulation results comparing the optimal solution with the distributed spectrum allocation solutions based on max-RSP and min-RSP schemes are also presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it