Testamento Vital: Uma Análise a Partir do Direito Estrangeiro e de um Leading Case Brasile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article aims to study the living will institute, that is, the last will that involves far more sublime and important human being, ie his own life when involved an infirmity of circumstance or record incurable physical damage of great physical suffering generators. In this sense, the initial idea is directed to understanding own researched object, that is, of what is to be effectively living will. Then they present the controversies they generate around the object of this research. By then, the issue is approached from the perspective of foreign law, appearing especially the specific regulations of the United States of Ame- rica, Canada, European Union, Britain, Spain, Portugal and Italy. Understood the living will that multiple perspective, the idea directs to understanding the issue regarding the human ability to test, when contrasted it with the provisions of their own national law. Finally, the concluding ideas are presented in a coordinated way in order to show the essence of the concerns that have fueled this study. The research was built through biblio- graphic research, documentary, and other sources of written information, which has used the qualitative approach method and deductive method of data analysis, with the help of intensive direct observation technique and method monographic procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".