OSL investigations at Hardisty, Alberta, Canada: Sections HD03, HD04 & HD05
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report is concerned with optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) investigations of a number of sediment stratigraphies in the Battle River Valley area, near Hardisty, east-central Alberta. Archaeological investigations in this region, led by Rob Wondrasek, have identified thousands of historical artefacts, including projectile points and lithic fragments indicative of occupation. Ken Munyikwa visited the archaeological sites at Hardisty in June 2014 and January 2015 to sample key units within the sediment stratigraphies for OSL dating. The sediments associated with the artefacts were appraised through five profiles, Hardisty-1 (HD01) to Hardisty-5 (HD05), comprised of 43 field-profiling and 14 dating samples. Profiles HD01 and HD02 were sampled in June 2014; and profiles HD03 through to HD05 in January 2015. The dating questions associated with these materials relate to the age of artefact-bearing horizon, through dating the enclosing sediments above and beneath the archaeological soil, it should be possible to provide terminus post quem (TPQ) and terminus ante quem (TAQ) on the age of the artefacts. The conventional quartz SAR OSL approach was examined as a potential method for providing the depositional ages of the sediment enclosing the artefacts. Luminescence profiling during fieldwork had revealed stratigraphically progressive IRSL and OSL signals, indicating sediment with dating potential. Dose rate estimates from these sediments were assessed using a combination of high resolution gamma spectrometry (HRGS) and thick source beta counting (TSBC), reconciled with each other, water contents and modelled micro-dosimetry. Where appropriate, the external gamma dose rates received at the position of the dating sample were reconstructed from the adjacent bulk gamma spectrometry samples, yielding wet gamma dose rates between 0.42 and 0.54 mGy a-1, which are comparable with those recorded at each sampling position. Equivalent doses were determined by OSL from 16-48 aliquots of quartz per sample (depending on quartz yields) using a single-aliquot-regenerative (SAR) approach. The material exhibited good OSL sensitivity and produced acceptable SAR internal quality control performance. Radial plotting methods revealed some heterogeneity in the equivalent dose distributions of each sample, indicating that each sample enclosed mixed-age materials, reflecting variable bleaching at deposition. The field profiles provide some measure of control on this. Luminescence ages were calculated using standard microdosimetric models, with uncertainties that combined measurement and fitting errors from the SAR analysis, all dose rate evaluation uncertainties, and allowance for the calibration uncertainties of the sources and reference materials. The quartz OSL ages reported here for the sand sequences at HD03 to HD05, contribute to the expanding catalogue of chronological data on the depositional sequences at Hardisty, and further, provide the means to assess the temporal and spatial distribution of artefacts across the site. The sediment chronologies established for each profile are internally and mutually coherent, spanning at HD03 from 7.3 ± 0.3 ka (SUTL2778) to 9.0 ± 0.5 ka (SUTL2780), at HD04 from 7.0 ± 0.3 ka (SUTL2781) to 8.3 ± 0.4 ka (SUTL2782), and at HD05 from 8.3 ± 0.5 ka (SUTL2783) to 9.6 ± 0.6 ka (SUTL2785). The field profile at HD05 reveals some complexity to its depositional history, with notable maxima and inversions in intensities from 150cm depth, potentially reflecting reworking and re-deposition of sediment within this sequence. TAQ for this phase of reworking is provided by the youngest unit examined in the profile, which at 7.5 ± 0.6 ka (SUTL2784), is consistent with the occupational phase recorded in the adjacent sections. The sediment chronologies established in this dating campaign, and in the 2014 campaign, are synchronous suggesting contemporaneous deposition across the site, and presumably, with local knowledge, scope for further age modelling including the use of Bayesian methods to refine the TAQ and TPQ age limits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".