MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2609549565

黄灯笼辣椒辣椒素合成相关基因CCaPun1(酰基转移酶)生物信息学和表达分析

2016· article· zh· W2609549565 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
申龙斌, 刘子记, 曹振木

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2016
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant biochemistry and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

本研究根据已发表的辣椒基因组序列信息,设计PCR引物,利用RT-PCR的方法从海南黄灯笼辣椒中克隆了辣椒素合成相关基因Pun1基因(酰基转移酶基因),并命名为CCa Pun1基因。通过生物信息学及表达分析发现,该基因CDS区全长1 323 bp,编码440个氨基酸,推测为亲水蛋白;蛋白二级结构中α-螺旋占42.05%,延伸链占14.55%,无规则卷曲占33.64%,β-转角占9.77%。与灌木状辣椒及一年生辣椒的亲缘关系最近,分别达99.4%、98.3%。表达量分析发现,CCa Pun1基因在果实绿熟期表达量最高,其次为幼果期和膨大期。CCa Pun1基因的克隆与表达分析可为海南黄灯笼辣椒辣椒素合成相关机制的进一步研究奠定理论基础。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicPlant biochemistry and biosynthesisFrench-language works237,207