MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2609666271 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618557114

NIP1;2 is a plasma membrane-localized transporter mediating aluminum uptake, translocation, and tolerance in <i>Arabidopsis</i>

2017· article· en· W2609666271 on OpenAlexaff
Yuqi Wang, Ruihong Li, De-Mou Li, Xiaomin Jia, Dangwei Zhou, Jianyong Li, Sangbom M. Lyi, Siyu Hou, Yulan Huang, Leon V. Kochian, Jiping Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
Canadian institutionsGlobal Institute for Water SecurityUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersArizona Biomedical Research Commission
KeywordsArabidopsisChromosomal translocationTransporterMembraneCell biologyPlasmaChemistryBiophysicsBiologyGeneBiochemistryPhysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Aluminum (Al) toxicity is a major constraint for crops grown on acid soils. Various plant species have adopted an Al exclusion/avoidance mechanism and/or internal tolerance mechanisms to ameliorate Al toxicity. In Arabidopsis , the root organic acid exudation-based Al exclusion mechanism has been well characterized; however, no evidence for an internal Al tolerance mechanism has been reported. Here we identify NIP1;2 as an Al-malate transporter involved in Al removal from root cell walls and root-to-shoot Al translocation. We report that the NIP1;2-mediated Al-malate transport is dependent on Al-activated root malate efflux mediated by ALMT1 in Arabidopsis . Taken together, our findings demonstrate the importance of the coordination between Al exclusion and internal Al detoxification mechanisms in Al tolerance in Arabidopsis .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations171
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicAluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animalsFrench-language works237,207