MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2609711955 · doi:10.1113/ep086051

Impact of obstructive sleep apnoea and intermittent hypoxia on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular regulation

2017· review· en· W2609711955 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2017
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaFoothills Medical CentreHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsGovernment of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean Respiratory SocietyHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsIntermittent hypoxiaMedicineHypoxia (environmental)DiseaseCardiologyInternal medicineAnimal studiesOxygenObstructive sleep apnea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Findings What is the topic of this review? This review examines the notion that obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and intermittent hypoxia (IH) have hormetic effects on vascular health. What advances does it highlight? Clinical (OSA patient) and experimental animal and human models report that IH is detrimental to vascular regulation. However, mild IH and, by extension, mild OSA also have physiological and clinical benefits. This review highlights clinical and experimental animal and human data linking OSA and IH to vascular disease and discusses how hormetic effects of OSA and IH relate to OSA severity, IH intensity and duration, and patient/subject age. Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, a consequence attributed in part to chronic intermittent hypoxia (IH) resulting from repetitive apnoeas during sleep. Although findings from experimental animal, and human, models have shown that IH is detrimental to vascular regulation, the severity of IH used in many of these animal studies [e.g. inspired fraction of oxygen ( ) = 2–3%; oxygen desaturation index = 120 events h −1 ] is considerably greater than that observed in the majority of patients with OSA. This may also explain disparities between animal and recently developed human models of IH, where IH severity is, by necessity, less severe (e.g. = 10–12%; oxygen desaturation index = 15–30 events h −1 ). In this review, we highlight the current knowledge regarding the impact of OSA and IH on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular regulation. In addition, we critically discuss the recent notion that OSA and IH may have hormetic effects on vascular health depending on conditions such as OSA severity, IH intensity and duration, and age. In general, data support an independent causal link between OSA and vascular disease, particularly for patients with severe OSA. However, the data are equivocal for older OSA patients and patients with mild OSA, because advanced age and short‐duration, low‐intensity IH have been reported to provide a degree of protection against IH and ischaemic events such as myocardial infarction and stroke, respectively. Overall, additional studies are needed to investigate the beneficial/detrimental effects of mild OSA on the various vascular beds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it