RECIRCULATION OF CONFINED VARIABLE DENSITY TURBULENT JETS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An investigation of recirculating characteristics of circular turbulent confined jets with large density variations is presented. This numerical study aims at testing analytical predictions associated with the Craya-Curtet number. It investigates also its effect on the dynamic field and recirculation. It appears that for different density (He-air, CO2-air) and geometry ratios, the non-isothermal Craya-Curtet number [1] is not sufficient to describe the flow pattern or predict its recirculation. Depending on the momentum, aspect and density ratios of the flow, the centre of the recirculating flow (the eye) tends to reach the initial (non-self-preserving) region of the jet and influences the development of the jet. As a consequence, predictions are not in agreement with theory. The reason is that initial conditions do not satisfy the hypothesis used in the prediction of recirculation theory. Calculations are performed in three configurations: CO2, air and He. These configurations are fully developed pipe jets evolving in an air secondary turbulent flow. Validations are performed using experimental data [2] obtained in similar configurations for the three gases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".