Las asociaciones económicas para el corso de los ar madores vascos en el siglo XVII
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolLa necesidad de fuertes inversiones previas y la in seguridad de los beneficios llevaron a los armadores vascos a asociarse a fin de preparar emba rcaciones para el corso (al igual que en otras navegaciones tambien arriesgadas, como las pesqueri as de Terranova). En estas sociedades economicas habia una armador principal, que era qui en recibia la patente de corso por parte de la Corona espanola, unos miembros responsables de que se cumpliese la ley (los fiadores) y unos meros inversores. Eran sociedades de comandita simp le euskaraAurretiazko inbertsio handien beharrak eta etekinen ziurtasunik ezak bultzatu zituen euskal armadoreak elkartzera, ontziak itsaslapurretarako p restatzeko helburuz (beste nabigazio arriskutsuetan bezalaxe, Ternuako arrantza adibide) . Elkarte ekonomiko hauetan armadore nagusi bat egon ohi zen, -eta honek jasotzen zuen kotsorako pa tentea Espainiako koroak emanda-, eta legea betetzearen ardura zuten zenbait kide,fidatzaileak eta inbertsore huts zirenak. Komandita soileko elkarteak ziren EnglishAs a result for the need for major investment and t he insecurity of profits, Basque ship-owners often went into partnership to prepare vessels for privat eering (as they did for other hazardous undertakings , such as the Newfoundland fisheries). These compan ies contained a principal ship- owner, who received the Letter of Marque from the S panish Crown, various partners who were responsible for compliance with the law (the guaran tors) and a number of sleeping partners (investors). The companies took the form of limited partnerships
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it