MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610034785 · doi:10.5539/jel.v6n3p229

Health Care Supervisor’s Role in Enhancing the Effectiveness of Health Education Areas in Ma’an City Schools in Jordan

2017· article· en· W2610034785 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bassam S. Al-Emami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education and Learning · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSchool Health and Nursing Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthSample (material)PopulationSupervisorPsychologyData collectionHealth educationMedical educationHealth careDescriptive researchEnvironmental healthMedicineSociologyNursingSocial sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed at showing health supervisor’s role in enhancing the effectiveness of health education areas in public schools in the city of Ma’an, Jordan, and its relationship to some demographic variables for the academic year 2016-2017.The study population consists of all health supervisors in public schools in the city of Ma’an for the academic year 2016-2017. The entire school number reached 38 schools including 13 schools for males, and 25 schools for females. The total sample size of the study was 38 supervisors as each school had one health supervisor. Due to the lack of the school populations, all the 38 supervisors had been used by 100% of the school population for the purpose of this study. In addition, the researcher had used descriptive analytical approach based on the case study or phenomenon as it was existed in the case. This phenomenon had been described accurately and expressed qualitatively and quantitatively.A study tool of 22 questions had been used for the application of this study and its data collection. The tool included four main parts: the first part contained questions 1-7 related to the first area (nutrition), and the second part contained questions 8-12 of the second area environmental health and public safety, whereas the third part had questions 13-17 which showed the third area the personal health of students and promoting health awareness. As to part four, it contained questions 18-22 related to the fourth area Reproductive health. Each response had been scaled according to Likert Scale Quintet.Data had been analyzed through the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Also, frequencies, mean as well as standard deviation had been the statistical methods used for describing the variability of some data in our study. Furthermore, differential analysis tests such as analysis of variance test (One-Way ANOVA) had been used to see if there was any difference in the mean scores among groups on some variable. In addition, Cronbach’s Alpha had been used to measure the scale consistency.One of the most important results, shown by our study, had been the significant and effective role of the school health supervisor in Ma’an public schools for the academic year 2016-2017 in all areas of health education mentioned in the questionnaire. In addition, the results showed non-existence of statistically significant differences, attributed to variation in gender and the level of education, at the level of (α ≥ 0.05) for the role of health supervisor in enhancing the effectiveness of areas of health education in public schools. In the light of the results obtained in the present study, the researcher made many recommendations, among which the most important are: identifying health officer in each school who must have the required qualifications to hold the title of a health supervisor so that he/she could achieve all responsibilities to the fullest. Another important recommendation was to make an ongoing evaluation of school health programmes in those schools and also make workshops, seminars and conferences for teachers specializing in school health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.422 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Education and LearningSame topicSchool Health and Nursing EducationFrench-language works237,207