MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610141124 · doi:10.1016/j.wem.2017.01.025

Don’t Kick the Coral!

2017· article· en· W2610141124 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter J. M. Ceponis, Rebecca Cable, Lindell K. Weaver

Bibliographic record

VenueWilderness and Environmental Medicine · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Armed Forces
FundersSchool of MedicineCanadian Armed Forces
KeywordsShoreFoot (prosody)Abrasion (mechanical)MedicineAncient historyHistoryGeologyOceanographyArtEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 44-year-old woman was vacationing on Aruba in the southern Caribbean Sea with her spouse. They explored a partially submerged plane wreck near Renaissance Island, snorkeling approximately 50 m away from their shore entry. She was equipped with a mask and snorkel, but no fins. Water conditions offshore were rougher than anticipated, and waves pushed them close to portions of the wreck that were just below the surface. She began kicking harder to swim away from the wreck, and the dorsum of her right foot struck a submerged piece of the wreck.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1820.087

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWilderness and Environmental MedicineSame topicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyFrench-language works237,207