MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2610159299 · doi:10.5539/mas.v11n6p1

Effectiveness of Education of Affectional Contact Skills on Lonely Sense and Social Emotional Learning of Children above 10 Years of Mothers (Nurses) Night Shift of Saveh City Hospitals

2017· article· en· W2610159299 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mozhgan Haj Alimohammadi, Fatemeh Shateriyan Assistant, Azadeh Farghadani

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)PsychologySocial emotional learningSocial contactDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this research was determination of effectiveness amount of education of affectional contact skills on lonely sense and social emotional learning of children above 10 years of mothers (nurses) night shift of Saveh city hospitals. The way of this research is an experiment with plan of pretest and posttest with experiment and control group. The sample of research includes 40 practitioner nurses women in night shifts in hospital and 40 childs above 10 years. In this research, recommendation of affectional contact skills for learning mothers was used. For collecting information, the scale of lonely sense of Asher children and scale of social- emotional learning on children as pretest and posttest was done. In this research, the software (Spss) was used for analyzing data. The findings suggest that education of affectional contact skills on lonely sense and also on social-emotional learning of children above 10 years of mothers (nurses) night shift of Saveh city hospitals is useful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied Science→Same topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development→French-language works237,207→