MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610201768

Estudio comparativo de la articulación escapulo-humeral canina mediante artroscopia y resonancia magnética

2012· article· es· W2610201768 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nelson Gregorio Orellana Jaimes

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolLa Imagen por Resonancia Magnetica (IRM) es una tecnica de reciente introduccion en medicina veterinaria con una creciente demanda, particularmente, en la articulacion escapulo-humeral del canino. El objetivo de este trabajo es estudiar la articulacion escapulo-humeral del canino mediante artroscopia e Imagen por Resonancia Magnetica. Para tal fin, se desarrollo un protocolo de RM para evaluar la articulacion en caninos sanos y enfermos, comparando los resultados obtenidos con los hallazgos encontrados en la artroscopia. El 91.67% de los animales afectados fueron perros de talla media a grande, entre 2 y 7 anos, incluyendo mestizos, Pastor Aleman, Labrador Retriever, Gran Danes, Boxer y perro de Aguas. Los diagnosticos mas frecuentes con IRM fueron: Tendinopatia del supraespinoso (TS) en el 45.83% de los casos, seguido por la Inestabilidad Articular Escapulo-humeral (IAEH) con 20.83%, Tendosinovitis Bicipital (TSB) y Osteocondritis Disecante (OCD) con 12.5%, en ultimo lugar la Osificacion Incompleta del centro caudal de Glenoide (OICCG) y la contractura Fibrotica del Musculo Infraespinoso (CFMI) con 4.16%. Los diagnosticos mas frecuentes con la artroscopia fueron: IAEH en el 41.66% de los casos, seguida de OCD y TSB con el 25% y en ultimo lugar la OICCG con 8,33%. El porcentaje de concordancia entre las dos tecnicas fue del 85,4%. En cuanto a las enfermedades como la OCD o la OICCG se obtuvo el 100% de concordancia. En cuanto a la IAEH se obtuvo un 80% y en la TSB un 66.66%. En el 14,6% de los casos se sobreestimo el grado de compromiso inflamatorio atribuido por IRM con respecto a lo observado en la artroscopia. La IRM permitio evaluar los componentes intra, y extra-articulares, la extension de la lesion en el hueso subcondral y valorar el derrame articular. La artroscopia permitio una valoracion mas detallada de la membrana sinovial, las erosiones superficiales del cartilago y realizar los test dinamicos, asi como, conocer la textura de los tejidos afectados mediante la palpacion con la instrumentacion artroscopica. Adicionalmente permitio la resolucion quirurgica de algunos casos en el mismo tiempo operatorio. En conclusion la IRM permitio una valoracion integral de la articulacion por lo que se considera que es la tecnica de eleccion en el estudio de la articulacion escapulo-humeral del canino. ARTHROSCOPY AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE OF CANINE SHOULDER JOINT. A COMPARATIVE STUDY. SUMMARY. Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) is recently reasonable widespread in veterinary medicine and veterinarians are increasing its use in canine shoulder disease. The objective of this job is to study shoulder joint of dogs through arthroscopy and Magnetic Resonance Image. In order to screen canine shoulder disease a protocol of Magnetic resonance was performed and proved in healthy dogs and dogs with shoulder disease. Magnetic resonance image were compared with arthroscopic findings. The 91.67% of dogs were 2-7 years, medium and large breed including crossbreed, German Sheppard, Retrievers, Great Dane, Boxer and water dogs. More frequently RMI diagnostic were 45.83% Supraspinatus Tendinopathy (ST), 20.83% Instability joint disease (IJD), 12.5% Bicipital Tenosynovitis (TSB) and Osteochondrosis Dissecans (OCD) of humeral head, and 4.16% Incomplete ossifications or caudal center of Glenoid Cavity (IOCCGC) and Infraspinatus muscle contracture (FIMC). More frequently diseases by arthroscopy were 41.66% IJD, 25% TSB and OCD and 4.16% IOCCGC and FIMC. Concordance between both techniques was 85.4%. Regarding to disease like Osteochondritis Dissecans and Incomplete Ossification of Caudal Glenoid cavity concordance was 100%, with regard to Shoulder Joint Instability was an 80% and Tenosynovitis of Biceps Tendon was a 66.66%. Inflammatory degree was overestimate in 14.6% of cases compared with arthroscopic findings. IRM revealed intra and extra articular disease, subcondral bone lesions and joint effusion. Arthroscopy allowed best assessment of synovial membrane and joint cartilage and to perform dynamic functional test. The affected tissues consistence was determined by palpation with arthroscopy instrumentation. Moreover arthroscopy allowed surgery treatment at the same time. MRI is a noninvasive technique that allowed a comprehensive assessment of the shoulder joint and is the best choice to diagnose canine shoulder diseases. EnglishMagnetic Resonance Image (MRI) is recently reasonable widespread in veterinary medicine and veterinarians are increasing its use in canine shoulder disease. The objective of this job is to study shoulder joint of dogs through arthroscopy and Magnetic Resonance Image. In order to screen canine shoulder disease a protocol of Magnetic resonance was performed and proved in healthy dogs and dogs with shoulder disease. Magnetic resonance image were compared with arthroscopic findings. The 91.67% of dogs were 2-7 years, medium and large breed including crossbreed, German Sheppard, Retrievers, Great Dane, Boxer and water dogs. More frequently RMI diagnostic were 45.83% Supraspinatus Tendinopathy (ST), 20.83% Instability joint disease (IJD), 12.5% Bicipital Tenosynovitis (TSB) and Osteochondrosis Dissecans (OCD) of humeral head, and 4.16% Incomplete ossifications or caudal center of Glenoid Cavity (IOCCGC) and Infraspinatus muscle contracture (FIMC). More frequently diseases by arthroscopy were 41.66% IJD, 25% TSB and OCD and 4.16% IOCCGC and FIMC. Concordance between both techniques was 85.4%. Regarding to disease like Osteochondritis Dissecans and Incomplete Ossification of Caudal Glenoid cavity concordance was 100%, with regard to Shoulder Joint Instability was an 80% and Tenosynovitis of Biceps Tendon was a 66.66%. Inflammatory degree was overestimate in 14.6% of cases compared with arthroscopic findings. IRM revealed intra and extra articular disease, subcondral bone lesions and joint effusion. Arthroscopy allowed best assessment of synovial membrane and joint cartilage and to perform dynamic functional test. The affected tissues consistence was determined by palpation with arthroscopy instrumentation. Moreover arthroscopy allowed surgery treatment at the same time. MRI is a noninvasive technique that allowed a comprehensive assessment of the shoulder joint and is the best choice to diagnose canine shoulder diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyFrench-language works237,207