Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article envisage le travail policier sous l’angle de sa mise en images dans la rue et de la diffusion de ces documents (audio)visuels sur les plateformes de partage de l’Internet. Grâce à une enquête ethnographique dans une grande police urbaine nord-américaine, nous montrons comment la « sousveillance » de la police par ses publics marque fortement les perceptions professionnelles des agents en uniforme et modifie leur appréhension des situations d’intervention. Soumis aux regards des foules équipées de caméras miniatures, mais aussi producteurs eux-mêmes d’images grâce à des dispositifs embarqués (dans les véhicules ou accrochés à leur uniforme), les agents seraient alors mieux aptes à rendre des comptes et communiquer sur leurs actions. Entre information du public, mise en débat des actions policières et autopromotion de la police, l’article interroge ce rôle des images et souligne l’importante transformation de la visibilité policière qui s’y joue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".