MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610241491 · doi:10.1016/j.ajoc.2017.05.001

Endothelial keratoplasty for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in a 4-month-old infant

2017· article· en· W2610241491 on OpenAlexaff
M. Hermina Strungaru, Asim Ali, David S. Rootman, Kamiar Mireskandari

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCorneal surgery and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOphthalmologyCorneal dystrophyCorneal diseaseDystrophyCorneal DiseasesCorneaOptometryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To report a case of endothelial keratoplasties (EKs) performed in a 4 month old with a posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. OBSERVATIONS: A 4 month old infant underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. The graft was found to be dislocated on day 5 post-operatively and an attempt to unfold the DMEK scroll and re-bubble was not successful. The patient was then treated successfully with bilateral Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). At 3 years of follow-up, her visual acuity was 20/70 in the right and 20/60 in the left eye with good endothelial cell counts. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: and Importance: This study reports the youngest case of EKs performed at the age of 4 months in an infant. This is also the first reported case of attempted DMEK highlighting its challenges in infants. DSAEK remains a good treatment option for endothelial dysfunction secondary to posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in infants even after failed DMEK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score0.774

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology Case ReportsSame topicCorneal surgery and disordersFrench-language works237,207