MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610242514

Правовое положение мэра и главы местной администрации в системе местного самоуправления (сравнительный опыт Канады и России)

2016· article· ru· W2610242514 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ларичев Александр Алексеевич

Bibliographic record

VenueАктуальные проблемы российского права · 2016
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Policy Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceVirtuePoliticsAdministration (probate law)Public administrationLaw and economicsSociologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article considers the legal status of heads of municipalities (mayors) and the heads of local administration in Canada and Russia in the comparative aspect. The authors make some conclusions about the dynamics of the statuses of the relevant officials in these countries and the difficulties in their precise definition, by virtue of both managerial and political factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueАктуальные проблемы российского праваSame topicLegal and Policy IssuesFrench-language works237,207