MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2610255485 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.7b02192

Rotational Spectroscopic Study of Quantum Solvation in Isotopologic (<i>p</i>H<sub>2</sub>)<sub><i>N</i></sub>–CO Clusters

2017· article· en· W2610255485 on OpenAlexafffund
Paul L. Raston, Wolfgang Jäger

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnisotropyFourier transformSpectral lineAtomic physicsPhysicsChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the Fourier transform microwave spectra of ( p H 2 ) N – 13 C 16 O, ( p H 2 ) N – 12 C 18 O, and ( p H 2 ) N – 13 C 18 O ( N ≤ 8) clusters. We find that the frequencies of the a -type J = 1–0 transitions decrease to a minimum at N = 6 and then rapidly increase up to at least N = 8; this is similar to what was previously reported for ( p H 2 ) N – 12 C 16 O, for which the turnaround was found to correlate with an increase in the superfluid fraction of the p H 2 component of the clusters [ Raston Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 253402]. The data suggest that the turnaround in the transition frequency marks an abrupt decrease in the anisotropy of the potential (i.e., in going from N = 6 → 7 → 8), as evidenced from the isotopologic differences rapidly evolving from end-over-end to free-rotor character. Structurally, a more quantitative analysis of the anisotropy was hindered by the lack of accurate frequencies in the b -type series, and a simple Kraitchman analysis yielded unphysical results. In addition to comparing the transition frequencies of the different isotopologic clusters, we provide here more comprehensive details and further discussion of the initial measurements made on ( p H 2 ) N – 12 C 16 O.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207